FUQAHA SHAFI'IYYAH AND HANABILAH UNDERSTANDING OF THE HADITH OF PROSTRATION MEMBERS IN PRAYER

Tarmizi M. Jakfar, Nur Najihah Aula

Abstract


The jurists differ as to the legal status of sticking one's nose to the place of prostration or the floor. These differences of opinion influenced public opinion and opinions, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. For example, related to the opinion regarding the law of wearing a mask at times because it can cover the nose so that it can cancel the prayer, but there is also an opinion that says that it is permissible to use it. The controversy between whether or not it is permissible to use something that prevents the nose from sticking together when prostrating is conveyed by the Syafi'ī and Ḥanbalī schools. Therefore, this article explains the difference between the Al-Syāfi‘ī school and the Ḥanbalī school in determining the law of sticking the nose when prostrating? and what are the arguments and methods of ijtihad used by the scholars of the Al-Syāfi‘ī and Ḥanbalī schools? This research approach is a qualitative approach, this type of research is normative legal research, while the nature of the data analysis used is the comparative analysis method. The results of this study indicate that the differences between the Al-Syāfi‘ī and Ḥanbalī schools in establishing the law of sticking one's nose during prostration are identified in two points. First, about the legal status. According to the scholars of the Shafi'i school, the nose is not a part of the face that must be attached during prostration, the law is only limited to sunnah. The Hanbali school considers that the nose, the part of the face that must be attached to the ground, is obligatory. Second, about the legal consequences. For the scholars of the Shafi'i school, the legal consequences of praying without sticking your nose are still valid, while according to the Hanbali school it is not valid. The argument of the scholars of the Syafi'i school is the hadith narrated by Imam Al-Bukhari from Ibn Abbas, that the members of prostration are only the forehead, both hands, both knees and both feet. No mention of nose. Then Daruquthni's narration from Jabir, when he saw Rasulullah Saw prostrating with the top of the forehead near the hair. The istinbat method used is the bayani and ta'lili methods. Meanwhile, according to the Hanbali school, the argument used is the history of Imam Al-Bukhari from Ibn Abbas who mentions the Prophet's gesture to point his nose in prostration. Then the narrations of Muslim and Al-Nasa'i regarding the mention of jabhah wa al-anfu (forehead and nose) as members of prostration, in addition to the history of Atsram which states that it is obligatory to stick your nose during prayer. The istinbat method used is the bayani method and the ta'lili method.


Keywords


Law, sticking nose, bow down.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abd Al-Malik bin Abdullah bin Yusuf Al-Juwaini, Nihayah Al-Mathlab fi Dirayah Al-Mazhab, Juz 2, Jeddah: Dar Al-Minhaj, 2007.

Abdul Karim Al-Rafi’i, Al-Aziz Syarh Al-Wajiz: Syarh Al-Kabir, Juz 1, Beirut: Dar Al-Kutb Al-Ilmiyyah, 1997.

Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Ahmad Al-Thayyar, Wabal Al-Ghamamah fi Syarh Umdah Al-Fiqh li Ibn Qudamah, Juz 1, Arab Saudi: Dar Al-Wathan, 2011.

Abdurraḥmān Al-Jazīrī, Al-Fiqh alā Al-Mażāhib Al-Arba’ah, Terj: Shofa’u Qolbi Djabir, Dudi Rosyadi, dan Rasyid Satari, Jilid 1, Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2015.

Abī Al-Ḥasan Al-Māwardī, Al-Ḥāwī Al-Kabīr fī Fiqh Mażhab Al-Imām Al-Syāfi‘ī, Juz’ 2, Beirut: Dār Al-Kutb Al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1994.

Abi Al-Husain Yahya Ibn Abi Al-Khair Ibn Salim Al-‘Imrani Al-Syafi’i Al-Yamani, Al-Bayan fi Mazhab Al-Imam Al-Syafi’i, Juz 2, Riyad: Dar Al-Minhaj, 2011.

Abi Ishaq Al-Syirazi, Al-Muhazzab fi Fiqh Al-Imam Al-Syafi’i, Tahqiq: Muhammad Al-Zuhaili, Juz 1, Damaskus: Dar Al-Qalam, 1996.

Abi Wafa’ Ali bin ‘Aqil bin Muhammad bin ‘Aqil Al-Baghdadi Al-Hanbali, Al-Tazkirah fi Al-Fiqh ‘ala Mazhab Al-Imam Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Hanbal, Riyadh: Dar Isybilia, 2001.

Abī Zakariyyā Muḥyiddīn bin Syarf Al-Nawawī, Majmū‘ Syaraḥ Al-Muhażżab, Taḥqīq: Muḥammad Najīb Al-Muṭī’ī, Juz 3, Jedah: Al-Maktabah Al-Irsyād, 1998.

Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali, Al-Wajiz, Beirut: Dar Al-Kutb Al-‘Ilmiyah, 2004.

Ajat Rukajat, Penelitian Pendekatan Kualitatif (Qualitative Research Approach), Yogyakarta: Deepublish CV Budi Utama, 2018.

Al Yasa’ Abubakar, Metode Istislahiah: Pemanfaatan Ilmu Pengetahuan dalam Ushul Fiqh, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2016.

Alā’uddīn Abī Al-Ḥasan ‘Alī bin Sulaimān bin Aḥmad Al-Mardāwī, Al-Inṣāf fī Ma’rifah Al-Rājiḥ min Al-Khilāf ‘alā Mażhab Imām Aḥmad bin Ḥanbal, Juz 2, Dār Al-Kutb Al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2012.

Ali bin Umar Daruqutni, Sunan Daruqutni, Juz 1, Beirut: Al-Risalah, 1998.

Beni Ahmad Saebani, Metode Penelitian, Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2009.

Elvira Dewi Ginting, Analisis Hukum Mengenai Reorganisasi Perusahaan dalam Hukum Kepailitan, Medan: USU Press, 2010.

Ibn Qayyim Al-Jauziyyah, Zad Al-Ma’ad, (Jakarta: Griya Ilmu, tt.p), hlm. 320 dan 330.

Ibn Qudāmah, Al-Kāfī, Juz 1, Riyad: Hajar, 1993.

, Al-Mughni Syarh Al-Kabir, Juz 2, Riyad: Dar ‘Alim Al-Kutb, 1997.

, Al-Mughnī, Juz 2, Riyad: Dār ‘Ālim Al-Kutb, 1997.

Ibnu Rusyd, Bidāyah Al-Mujtahid wa Nihāyah Al-Muqtaṣid, (Terj: Al-Mas’udah), Jilid 1, Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2015.

Manṣūr bin Yūnus Al-Buhūtī, Kasysyāf Al-Qinā’, Juz 1, Beirut: Dār Al-Kutb Al-‘Ilmiyah 1996.

Muhammad Al-Zuhaili, Al-Qawa’id Al-Fiqhiyyah, Damaskus: Dar Al-Fikr, 2008.

Muhyiddin bin Syarf Al-Nawawi, Majmu’ Syarh Al-Muhazzab, (Terj: ), Jilid 3, Jakarta: Pustaka Azzam, 2009.

, Raudhah Al-Thalibin, Juz 1, Riyadh: Dar ‘Alim Al-Kutb, 2003.

Mustafa bin Sa’d bin Abduh Al-Asyuthi Al-Hanbali, Mathalib Uli Al-Nuha fi Syarh Al-Ghayah Al-Muntaha fi Fiqh Al-Hanbali, Juz’ 1, Beirut: Dar Al-Kutb Al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1971.

Nur Azizah, Mahasiswi Institut Agama Islam Tarbiyatut Tholabah Lamongan, dalam Jurnal: “The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law and Civil Law , Vol. 3, No. 2, Oktober 2022, dengan judul: “Anggota Sujud dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an dan Hadis (Kajian Empat Mazhab Fikih)”.

Reza Pahlevi Dalimunthe dan Istiva Ahyani mahasiswi UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, dalam jurnal: “Umantech Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Disiplin Indonesia, Vol. 1, No. 12, Oktober 2022”, dengan judul: “Sujud Perspektif Hadis Dan Implikasinya Dengan Kesehatan”.

Syamsuddin bin Muhammad bin Abdullah Al-Zarkasydi Al-Hanbali, Syarh Al-Kabir ala Mukhtashar Al-Kharaqi, Juz 1, Riyad: Maktabah, 1993.

Syarfuddin Musa Al-Hujawi Al-Maqdisi, Al-Iqna’ fi Fiqh Al-Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal, Juz 1, Beirut: Dar Al-Ma’rifah, 1998.

Syihabudin Al-Ramli, Nihayah Al-Muhtaj, Juz 1, Beirut: Darul Kutb, 2003.

U’luatul Badriyyah dan Ashif Az Zafi, Mahasiswa IAIN Kudus, dalam Jurnal: “Al-Muaddib :Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dan Keislaman, Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020)”.

Wahbah Al-Zuḥailī, Al-Fiqh Al-Islāmī wa Adillatuh, Terj: Abdul Hayyie Al-Kattani dkk, Jilid 2, Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2011.

Zainuddin bin Abdul Aziz Al-Malibari, Fath Al-Mu’in, Terjemah: Abul Hiyadh, Jilid 1, Surabaya: Al-Hidayah, 2006.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/dusturiyah.v13i1.18106

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Tarmizi M. Jakfar

 
Indexed by:

Justisia Justisia Justisia Justisia Justisia

 
Tools:

Justisia Justisia Justisia Justisia Justisia

All papers published in Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



Office address: Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry. Jl. Ar-Raniry, Kopelma Darussalam, Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh, Indonesia 23111. Email: [email protected]