ANALYSIS TA'ZIR PUNISHMENT AND ISTINBATH LEGAL METHOD IMAM MALIK'S PERSPECTIVE

Sufrizal Sufrizal, Muhammad Alwin Abdillah, M. Anzaikhan

Abstract


This study discusses the human ta'zir perspective of Imam Malik. Imam Malik argues that there is no minimum and maximum limit for uqubah / ta'zir punishment. It is well known in the Maliki madzhab, especially Imam Malik, that ta'zir punishment can exceed the limits of had punishment in some conditions and situations. Imam Malik once flogged a man who was found with a boy 400 lashes. Imam Malik's opinion is based on the actions of Umar bin Khatab r.a. where he flogged a man who faked Umar bin Khatab's ring to trick the baitul mal guard, with the aim of taking some of the baitul mal treasures. Caliph Umar at that time whipped him 100 times on the first, second and third day. If accumulated, umar bin khattab whipped the man 300 lashes. If we look at the istinbath method / method of determining the law used by Imam Malik r.a on this issue is to take the fatawa of the companions / mauquf hadith as a conceptual basis for determining the law and leave the Prophet's hadith which expressly prohibits the implementation of the ta'zir punishment beyond ten lashes. It is clearly seen in this problem that the characteristics of Imam Malik and his followers are very respectful of the words and actions of the companions even though at first glance they contradict the text.

Keywords


Ta'zir punishment, Istinbath, Imam Malik

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adam, Panji. “Eksistensi Sanksi Pidana Penjara Dalam Jarîmah Ta’zîr.” Tahkim (Jurnal Peradaban dan Hukum Islam) 2, no. 2 (October 25, 2019): 39–66.

Amarodin, Amarodin. “Sejarah Perkembangan Madzhab Dalam Hukum Islam Era Klasik:” Perspektive: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam 12, no. 1 (April 30, 2019): 50–60.

Amir, Dinasril Amir. “Profil Imam Malik Sebagai Muhaddits Dan Faqih Dalam Sejarah Pendidikan Islam Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Islam.” At-Tafkir 12, no. 1 (August 8, 2019): 1–10.

Asiyah, Nur, and Abdul Ghofur. “Kontribusi Metode Maṣlaḥah Mursalah Imam Malik Terhadap Pengembangan Hukum Ekonomi Syari’ah Kontemporer.” Al-Ahkam 27, no. 1 (April 30, 2017): 59–82.

Badriyyah, Luluatul, and Ashif Az Zafi. “Perbedaan Mazhab Empat Imam Besar (Hanafi, Maliki, Syafi’i, Dan Hambali) Dalam Paradigma Hukum Fikih.” Al-Muaddib : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dan Keislaman 5, no. 1 (May 16, 2020): 65–79.

Basyir, Muhammad. “Jarimah Yang Diancam Dengan ‘Uqūbāt Cambuk Dalam Pandangan Fiqh Syafi’Iyah Dan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Al-Mizan 6, no. 1 (June 30, 2019): 10–24.

Darsi, and Halil Husairi. “Ta’zir dalam Perspektif Fiqh Jinayat.” Al-Qisthu: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum 16, no. 2 (2018): 60–64.

Fachruddin, Khalid, and Yadi Harahap. “Child Justice System in ‘Uqubat Dropping of Child Sexual Abuse of Children: (Case Study of Meulaboh Syar’Iyah Court Decision Number 1/JN.Anak/2022/MS.Mbo).” Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 8, no. 1 (June 30, 2023): 109–122.

Fatimatuzzahra, Nabel Salma Nazela, and Nor Aliya Rahmi. “Pemikiran Mazhab Malikiyah: Sejarah, Pemikiran Dan Perkembangan Mazhab.” Islamic Education 1, no. 1 (May 8, 2023): 67–89.

Hayatudin, Amrullah. “Istinbath Hukum Imam Malik Ibn Anas Tentang Kadar Susuan Yang Mengharamkan Pernikahan.” Tahkim (Jurnal Peradaban dan Hukum Islam) 1, no. 2 (October 31, 2018): 23–39.

Herawati, Andi. “Maslahat Menurut Imam Malik Dan Imam Al-Ghazali (Studi Perbandingan).” DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum 12, no. 1 (January 20, 2014): 42–53.

Ibrahim, Nirwani, Moh Yasin Soumena, and Sunuwati. “Criminal Acts of Violence by Children against Parents According to Islamic Criminal Law:” Delictum: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam 1, no. 2 (May 31, 2023): 98–114.

Irwansyahlubis, Halimatus Adiah, and Muhammad Sibawaih. “Metode Ijtihad Imam Abu Hanifah Dan Imam Malik.” JURNAL CERDAS HUKUM 1, no. 1 (November 30, 2022): 89–99.

Khatimah, Husnul. “Metode Istinbath Imam Malik.” Progresif : Media Publikasi Ilmiah 5, no. 2 (2017): 7–15.

Lubis, Rahman Zulfadli, Zul Anwar Ajim Harahap, and Ahmad Sainul. “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Sanksi Tindak Pidana Pencurian Ringan Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam.” Jurnal El-Thawalib 3, no. 6 (December 27, 2022): 1112–1125.

Makinuddin, Makinuddin. “Tobat Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana HIraBah Dalam Alquran (Kajian Surat Al-Maidah: 33-34).” Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam 5, no. 2 (2019): 311–337.

Mawardi, Mawardi, Hamdani Hamdani, and Faisal Faisal. “Efektivitas ‘Uqubat Cambuk Dalam Mengurangi Angka Jarimah Pelecehan Seksual Di Kabupaten Aceh Utara.” Jurnal Geuthèë: Penelitian Multidisiplin 5, no. 1 (April 16, 2022): 63–71.

Misran, Misran. “Criteria of Offenses as Part of Ta’zir Penalty [Kriteria Tindak Pidana yang Diancam Hukuman Ta‘Zir].” Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum 10, no. 1 (June 30, 2021): 25–40.

Munir, Fitri Wardani. “Implementasi Hadis Cambuk Di Aceh Dan Relevansinya Terhadap Qanun Aceh.” Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis 2, no. 2 (December 30, 2019): 126–149.

Oslami, Achmad Fikri. “Penjatuhan Uqubat Pada Jarimah Maisir Menurut Qanun Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hukum Jinayat.” MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum 2, no. 1 (June 27, 2022): 31–39.

Rahmi, Elda Maisy, Ali Abu Bakar, and Suhaimi Suhaimi. “Pelaksanaan ‘Uqubat Restitusi terhadap Korban Perkosaan.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 21, no. 2 (August 29, 2019): 227–240.

Rofiq, Ahmad, Pujiyono Pujiyono, and Barda Nawawi Arief. “Eksistensi Tindak Pidana Ta’zir Dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat Indonesia.” Journal of Judicial Review 23, no. 2 (December 23, 2021): 241–256.

Sulistyoko, Arie, Nisa Aulia Rahmah, and Mi’rajziah Mi’rajziah. “Konsep Hukuman Islam Dalam Bingkai Hukum Tata Negara (Analisis Komparatif Hukum Q.S. Yusud Ayat 33, 42 Dan Al-Maidah Ayat 33).” JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND LAW STUDIES 1, no. 1 (April 13, 2017): 60–77.

Surya, Reni. “Klasifikasi Tindak Pidana Hudud dan Sanksinya dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam 2, no. 2 (May 29, 2019): 530–547.

Ulum, Khozainul. “Malik Ibn Anas Ibn Malik Dan Kitab Al-Muwaththa’: Introduksi Biografi Dan Karya Monumentalnya.” Akademika 11, no. 02 (December 1, 2017): 195–205.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/dusturiyah.v13i2.19367

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Sufrizal Sufrizal, Muhammad Alwin Abdillah, M. Anzaikhan

 
Indexed by:

Justisia Justisia Justisia Justisia Justisia

 
Tools:

Justisia Justisia Justisia Justisia Justisia

All papers published in Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



Office address: Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry. Jl. Ar-Raniry, Kopelma Darussalam, Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh, Indonesia 23111. Email: [email protected]