.png)
Email this article 
Damai Bertahan dan Konflik Berulang: Analisa terhadap Perdamaian Aceh
Abstract
This article aims to understand the complexities behind sustainable peace by employing the frameworks of durable peace theories and recurring conflict theories. The research methodology is a qualitative approach, with a primary focus on literature review. Through a critical analysis of relevant literature, this study adopts an inductive analysis method to identify, comprehend, and synthesize the factors that influence the sustainability of peace in Aceh. This process involves a critical evaluation of previous studies, related theories, and both historical and contemporary data concerning conflict and peace in Aceh. The findings of this research indicate that the sustainability of peace in Aceh cannot be attributed to a single factor. Instead, the results affirm that a combination of several factors plays a role. These factors include: (1) the duration and the level of damage caused by the conflict, which affect community perceptions and desires for peace; (2) the quality of the peace agreement, including provisions that facilitate reconciliation and social integration; and (3) the inclusion of former activists from the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) into the political and social structure, facilitating the transition from conflict to peace.
Abstrak: Artikel ini bertujuan untuk memahami kompleksitas di balik perdamaian yang berkelanjutan dengan menggunakan kerangka teori damai bertahan (durable peace theories) dan teori konflik berulang (recurring conflict theories). Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan kualitatif, dengan fokus utama pada tinjauan literatur. Melalui analisis kritis terhadap literatur yang relevan, penelitian ini mengadopsi metode analisis induktif untuk mengidentifikasi, memahami, dan mensintesis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi keberlanjutan perdamaian di Aceh. Proses ini melibatkan penilaian kritis terhadap studi-studi sebelumnya, teori-teori terkait, serta data historis dan kontemporer yang berkaitan dengan konflik dan perdamaian di Aceh. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa keberlanjutan perdamaian di Aceh tidak dapat dijelaskan oleh satu faktor tunggal. Sebaliknya, hasilnya menegaskan bahwa ada kombinasi dari beberapa faktor yang berperan. Faktor-faktor ini meliputi: (1) durasi dan tingkat kerusakan yang disebabkan oleh konflik, yang mempengaruhi persepsi dan keinginan masyarakat untuk perdamaian; (2) kualitas dari perjanjian damai, termasuk ketentuan-ketentuan yang memungkinkan untuk rekonsiliasi dan integrasi sosial; serta (3) inklusi mantan aktivis Gerakan Aceh Merdeka (GAM) ke dalam struktur politik dan sosial, yang memfasilitasi transisi dari konflik ke perdamaian.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Badran, Ramzi. “Intrastate Peace Agreements and the Durability of Peace.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 31, no. 2 (2014): 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894213501133.
Barron, Patrick, Samuel Clark, and Blair Palmer. “Incorporation and Institution-Building: Autonomy and Elections in Post-Conflict Aceh.” St Antony’s International Review 6, no. 1 (2010): 124–44.
Call, Charles T. Why Peace Fails: The Causes and Prevention of Civil War Recurrence. Why Peace Fails: The Causes and Prevention of Civil War Recurrence, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adu014.
Caplan, Richard, and Anke Hoeffler. “Why Peace Endures: An Analysis of Post-Conflict Stabilisation.” European Journal of International Security 2, no. 2 (2017): 133–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2017.2.
Collier, Paul, Anke Hoeffler, and Måns Söderbom. “Post-Conflict Risks.” Journal of Peace Research 45, no. 4 (July 24, 2008): 461–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343308091356.
Collier, Paul, and Nicholas Sambanis. “Understanding Civil War: A New Agenda.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002702046001001.
Creswell, John W. Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Dan Mixed (Edisi Ketiga). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2017.
David Mason, T., Mehmet Gurses, Patrick T. Brandt, and Jason Michael Quinn. “When Civil Wars Recur: Conditions for Durable Peace after Civil Wars.” International Studies Perspectives 12, no. 2 (May 2011): 171–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2011.00426.x.
Fortna, Virginia Page. “Scraps of Paper? Agreements and the Durability of Peace.” International Organization 57, no. 2 (April 15, 2003): 337–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303572046.
Hartzell, Caroline, Matthew Hoddie, and Donald Rothchild. “Stabilizing the Peace After Civil War: An Investigation of Some Key Variables.” International Organization 55, no. 1 (July 9, 2001): 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801551450.
Hegre, Håvard, and Håvard Mokleiv Nygård. “Governance and Conflict Relapse.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 59, no. 6 (September 28, 2015): 984–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002713520591.
Joshi, Madhav. “United Nations Peacekeeping, Democratic Process, and the Durability of Peace after Civil Wars.” International Studies Perspectives 14, no. 3 (August 2013): 362–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2012.00499.x.
Kingsbury, Damien. “A Mechanism to End Conflict in Aceh.” Security Challenges 1, no. 1 (2005): 73–88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26459021.
Licklider, Roy. “The Consequences of Negotiated Settlements in Civil Wars, 1945–1993.” American Political Science Review 89, no. 3 (September 2, 1995): 681–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082982.
Lie, Tove Grete, Helga Malmin Binningsbø, and Scott Gates. “Post-Conflict Justice and Sustainable Peace.” Conference Papers -- American Political Science Association, April 1, 2006, 1–35. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=979663.
Loyle, Cyanne E, and Benjamin J Appel. “Conflict Recurrence and Postconflict Justice: Addressing Motivations and Opportunities for Sustainable Peace.” International Studies Quarterly 61, no. 3 (September 1, 2017): 690–703. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx045.
Mansfield, Edward D., and Jack Snyder. “Pathways to War in Democratic Transitions.” International Organization 63, no. 2 (April 15, 2009): 381–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090134.
Marshall, Michael Christopher, and John Ishiyama. “Does Political Inclusion of Rebel Parties Promote Peace after Civil Conflict?” Democratization 23, no. 6 (September 18, 2016): 1009–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2016.1192606.
OHMURA, HIROTAKA. “Termination and Recurrence of Civil War: Which Outcomes Lead to Durable Peace after Civil War?” Japanese Journal of Political Science 12, no. 3 (December 2, 2011): 375–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S146810991100017X.
Stange, Gunnar, and Roman Patock. “From Rebels to Rulers and Legislators: The Political Transformation of the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) in Indonesia.” Southeast Asian Studies 29, no. 1 (2010): 95–120.
Suazo, Adan E. “Tools of Change: Long-Term Inclusion in Peace Processes *.” PRAXIS The Fletcher Journal of Human Security 28, no. 1 (2013): 5–27.
Toft, Monica Duffy. Securing the Peace. Princeton University Press, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7rzc6.
Wagner, Lynn, and Daniel Druckman. “Drivers of Durable Peace: The Role of Justice in Negotiating Civil War Termination.” Group Decision and Negotiation 26, no. 1 (January 1, 2017): 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10726-016-9511-9/FIGURES/1.
Walter, Barbara F. “Does Conflict Beget Conflict? Explaining Recurring Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research 41, no. 3 (2004): 371–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343304043775.
———. “Why Bad Governance Leads to Repeat Civil War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 59, no. 7 (2015): 1242–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002714528006.
Walter, Barbara F. “Conflict Relapse and the Sustainability of Post-Conflict Peace.” World Bank, 2011. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/128031468182669586/conflict-relapse-and-the-sustainability-of-post-conflict-peace.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/substantia.v25i2.22606
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Sahlan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
SUBSTANTIA: JURNAL ILMU-ILMU USHULUDDIN
DITERBIKAN OLEH:
FAKULTAS USHULUDDIN DAN FILSAFAT
UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI (UIN) AR-RANIRY BANDA ACEH, ACEH INDONESIA
ALAMAT REDAKSI:
Gedung Fakultas Ushuluddin Lantai II, Fakultas Ushuluddin, UIN Ar-Raniry, Jln. Lingkar Kampus, Kopelma Darussalam Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111.Telp. (0651)7551295. eMail: [email protected]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.